Enterprise hits and misses - workplace returns spark privacy debates, while Zoom and MongoDB get a digital economy boost

Profile picture for user jreed By Jon Reed September 8, 2020
Summary:
This week - returning to work(places) raises the privacy stakes - how will employers respond? Plus: will AI-based threat detection make us safer, or add to the surveillance culture? Plus: whiffs-a-plenty.

King Checkmate

Lead story - Returning to work safely - and the privacy implications

MyPOV: Leave it to Stuart take some time off from herding cats at diginomica managing our editorial and still score the lead story. In Privacy as a human right in a time of crisis - another aspect of the return to the workplace trust deficit, Stuart argues that a successful return to work won't happen unless employers overcome substantial data and privacy concerns. He quotes... Himself:

Your employer says it's safe to return, that precautions have been put in place and there's a new health-centric working model at play. But still, are you entirely convinced that the promises of being able to return to the office environment can be done safely?

Stuart goes on to cite Salesforce data - data that came to a similar conclusion: the so-called return to work(places) is about trust. This has ratcheted up the debate on data as a human right. The "hefty trust deficit" between employees and their employers isn't easily solved - and now there is something of a backlash against the technology that would supposedly ease this transition (e.g. problematic contact tracing apps). If there's one thing I take from Stuart's article, it's that returning to work safely is not really a technology problem.

How far can we get without a federal data protection law in the U.S.? Stuart raises the question. He adds:

In the meantime, city centers around the world remain unnervingly empty and the wholesale shift back to the office regime hasn't occurred despite exhortations.

Maybe instead of exhortations, we seize what opportunity there might be: call it the under-explored merits of decentralization.

Diginomica picks - my top stories on diginomica this week

Vendor analysis, diginomica style. Last week's vendor news was dominated by upbeat earnings from the new enterprise bellwethers. This week, the up-and-coming contingent made their earnings presence felt:

A few more vendor picks, without the quotables:

Jon's grab bag - As Kurt points out, the best tech doesn't always win: Standing out in the crowded security market - technology is not enough. Martin continues his edge computing series with the redemption of the mainframe: Mainframes in an edge computing world - Compuware providing the Phoenix with a box of matches. But can mainframes become part of a real-time data architecture?

Finally, as we gear up for a barrage of fall virtual events, I issued another missive: Virtual events and the flawed obsession with entertainment over interactivity - will fall events get it right? This piece was, in my view, improperly portrayed as a vendor spanking a vendor grilling.

Yes, there is a bit of satirical catharsis. But: there are loads of winning approaches in here also - and a call for experimentation. "Let the community you've already built works its magic." We're not looking to become event critics around here; looking back on mediocre events is a drag. Event planners - there is still time to do something special this fall. I'm not sure if that's an offer, a plea, or a prayer...

Best of the rest

Waiter suggesting a bottle of wine to a customer

Lead story - The utopian promise and dystopian potential of real-time detection of police, fire, and medical emergencies

MyPOV: On the enterprise beat, we hear plenty about the power of real-time detection and alerts, often powered by shiny new AI toys (or AI-enabled toys). For a gut check, there's no higher stakes than detection of public emergencies. This VentureBeat piece manages to walk a tricky tightrope between techno-optimism and properly paranoid. As Khari Johnson writes:

AI that calls for help if you're attacked in the street or your home is on fire sounds like a dream, but AI that tracks people across multiple camera systems and sends police to your location could be a dystopian nightmare.

Tech supervised by good people with good intentions? That genie never stays in the bottle. Johnson again:

There's also the risk of mission creep, in which surveillance technology acquired for one purpose is later used for another. The most recent examples come from San Diego, where smart street lamps were initially supposed to be used for gathering traffic and environmental data. Then police started requesting access to footage — first only for serious, violent crimes, but eventually for smaller infractions, like illegal dumping.

My enterprise lessons:

  • "We need privacy policies" - definitely, but wise governance is not enough. Example: how do companies handle the material/human damage of false positives?
  • AI image recognition is hardly foolproof - the higher the stakes, the tighter the leash...
  • Sometimes AI needs to be put on a leash - good design for threat detection includes human escalation and overrides.
  • We need better humans - yes, I'm joking, but we've reached the point where ethics courses are not out of the scope of what employers should provide.

On cybersecurity

The JEDI contract saga rolls on - Forget "Days of Our Lives" or "The Young and the Restless," the sand coming out of this hourglass is the legal and political fuss over the JEDI project. It's official - Oracle lost their cloud contract appeal, but as Ron Miller reports, the turgid drama tech potboiler goes on, with the DoD reaffirming Microsoft has won JEDI cloud contract - but: Amazon's legal complaint is still pending.

Honorable mention

Overworked businessman

Whiffs

Right on the heels of the breathless excitement we all feel about Motorola's new 5G phone, we have this Techdirty 5G rundown: Yet Another Study Shows U.S. 5G Is Far Slower Than Many Other Nations. I got a kick out of the Redditors' take downs. As in: "Routing it through the NSA's servers takes it down a bit."

Oh, and regarding our intelligent future:

Reminds me of my high school actually, though we had to improvise in analog. But not all technological advancements are concerning:

Finally, we had an interesting Twitter bash for a few minutes on this one:

There's a more serious conversation in here on the future of work. As for my antipathy towards Netflix, well, they shouldn't have canceled Jessica Jones. See you next time...

If you find an #ensw piece that qualifies for hits and misses - in a good or bad way - let me know in the comments as Clive (almost) always does. Most Enterprise hits and misses articles are selected from my curated @jonerpnewsfeed. 'myPOV' is borrowed with reluctant permission from the ubiquitous Ray Wang.